|
Electing
the Ratable Accrual Method to Accrue Real Property Taxes
Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 461: General Rule for Taxable
Year of Deduction
by William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant, Certified QuickBooks
ProAdvisor
Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC of Berlin, Connecticut
You
have chosen the accrual method as the accounting method on your tax
return. You recognize revenues when earned and expenses when
incurred. Last year you received real property tax bills but did
not paid them because of insufficient cash flow. You deducted the
real property taxes on your tax return since you are on the accrual
method for tax purposes. You are subsequently audited by the
Internal Revenue Service and denied this deduction. Why?
According to the Internal Revenue Code Section 461, in order for a
liability to have been incurred, allowing the deduction of an expense
for Federal income tax purposes, ordinarily several criteria need to be
met, two of which are contained in the “all events test” and one in the
concept of “economic performance”.
The all-events test has been met when:
- All events have occurred that fix the fact of
liability, and
- The liability can be determined with reasonable
accuracy.
Generally, economic performance occurs for property or services
provided when the property or services is provided; for the use of
property, economic performance occurs when the property or services is
provided or the property is used. But in
regard to tax liabilities, including real property taxes, the Code of
Federal Regulations Section 1.461-4(g)(6) clearly specifies that
economic performance does not occur until the tax is paid to the
governmental authority that imposed the tax: “Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (g)(6), if the liability of a taxpayer is to
pay a tax, economic performance occurs as the tax is
paid to the governmental authority that imposed the tax”, whether or
not the taxpayer is on the cash or accrual basis. Of course,
unless there is economic performance during the tax period,
there is no deductibility of the expense during that period.
Like many of the tax rules promulgated by the Treasury Department,
there is an exception to the requirement of payment of the tax for
economic performance to occur in order for its deductibility on one’s
tax return: “certain recurring items”,
mentioned in paragraph (g)(6), are treated as incurred during the year
and, hence, deductible for Federal income tax purposes. For an
item to be regarded as a recurring item during the year, it needs to
possess these following characteristics:
- Met the all-events test during the taxable year;
- Paid within the shorter of
- a reasonable period after the close of the taxable
year, or
- 8 ½ months after the close of the taxable year;
- Recurring in nature and items of such kind
consistently treated by the taxpayer as incurred during the taxable
year;
- Either—
- Not material, or
- Its accrual results in a more proper match against
income than accruing such item in the taxable year in which economic
performance occurs.
But, again, like so many of the exceptions to the tax rules promulgated
by the Treasury Department, there is usually an exception to the
exception to the tax rule: in this case, the recurring item
exception, however, does not apply to liabilities incurred by tax
shelters, including those structured as partnerships, where more than
35 percent of the losses during any period are allocable to individuals
not actively participating in the partnership. Since many real
estate companies are organized as partnerships for tax purposes, unless
the principal partners of these entities are at least actively involved
in the partnership, then the partnership may be considered a tax
shelter by the Internal Revenue Service and, as a result, ineligible to
meet the economic performance requirement, permitted under the
recurring item exception.
Referring to a Senate Report issued in 1986, the United States Tax
Court made clear in its memorandum decision of the case, Madler v.
Commissioner, the meaning of active participation on the part of the
taxpayer:
the
taxpayer participates,
e.g., in the making of management decisions or arranging for others to
provide services (such as repairs), in a significant and bona fide
sense. Management decisions that are relevant in this context
include approving new tenants, deciding on rental terms, approving
capital or repair expenditures, and other similar
decisions.
For any entity that is not a tax shelter, that entity is permitted to
adopt the recurring item exception as part of its method of accounting
for any type of item meeting the criteria mentioned above for the first
taxable year in which that type of item is incurred, thus allowing it
to meet the economic performance requirement and to deduct it on its
current year’s tax return. The election is effected simply by
deducting the item in its first year of incurrence. There is no
form required to be filed with the tax return stating overtly its
election for the recurring item(s). The act of doing such in its
first year’s occurrence suffices.
Conversely, any partner who receives more than 35% of the profits and losses of the partnership and who does not actively participate
in the management of said partnership has characterized that
partnership as a tax shelter to the IRS; consequently, that partnership
would not be able to accrue real property taxes under the recurring
item exception under IRC Sec. 461(h)(3).
For those partnerships and other entities that are construed as tax
shelters by the IRS, making them ineligible for the recurring items
exception to the recognition of economic performance prior to payment,
there is an election available to them to ratably accrue real property
taxes. This method is not surprisingly referred to as the
“ratable accrual method” and is briefly described in Section 461(c).
Under this method, the real property taxes are presumed to accrue
ratably, or in proportion to the amount of time, over the periods to
which they relate. For instance, if real property taxes relate to
years beginning July 1st and ending June 30th, then under the ratable
accrual method, if the current tax year is 2010, one-half of the real
property taxes for the property tax year ending June 30, 2010, and
one-half of the real property taxes for the property tax year ending
June 30, 2011 would be deductible to the calendar year taxpayer for the
year 2010.
Unlike the recurring item exception method, the ratable accrual method
does require a statement of election to be filed along with the
taxpayer’s tax return for the first year in which the property tax is
incurred, even though consent is not required from the Internal Revenue
Service. In other words, the election is automatic upon filing a
statement of election. The statement needs to include the
following information:
- The businesses to which the election applies, and the
method of accounting used therein;
- The period of time to which the taxes are related; and
- The computation of the deduction for real property
taxes for the first year of the election, or a summary of the
computation.
The election to ratably accrue real property taxes, of course, would
need to be filed by the due date of the tax return, including any
extensions. Because the election may be made for each separate
trade or business, the taxpayer needs to specify will particular
businesses to which the election applies. It will, however, apply
to all real property taxes of that trade or business for which the
election is made: the taxpayer is not allowed to ratably accrue
some but not all of the real property taxes of the named business or
businesses.
The taxpayer is also required here to include its method of accounting
for taxes since the election is available to accrual basis taxpayers.
For real property taxes, the period of time to which the taxes relate
refers to the tax year of the real property taxes and not that of the
taxpayer. If the real property tax year was July 1st
through June 30th, the taxpayer would indicate the time period for
one's fiscal or calendar tax year as follows: July 1, through
June 30.
The computation of the deduction for real property taxes for the first
year of the election need not be overly complicated; however, it should
tie-in to the amount reported on the tax return. For instance,
assume real property taxes for the real property tax year of July 1,
2009 through June 30, 2010 were $6,000; and assume real property taxes
for the real property tax year of July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011
were $7,000. A summary schedule as follows would ordinarily
suffice on the election statement:
| Calendar year ending December 31, 2010: |
January 1 through
June 30, 2010 (6/12 of $6,000)
|
$ 3,000 |
July 1 through
December 31, 2010 (6/12 of $7,000)
|
$ 3,500 |
|
Deduction for
calendar year ending December 31, 2010
|
$ 6,500
|
It is advisable to include an appropriate heading to the election
statement. For instance, the heading might read as follows:
Election to Ratably Real
Property Taxes
The taxpayer [or
partnership] elects under IRC 461(c) to ratably accrue real property
taxes.
The following information is provided in accordance with Regulation
1.461-(1)(c)(3)(i).
If the taxpayer wishes to elect this method after the first year of its
incurrence, then it would require the consent of the Internal Revenue
Service. The taxpayer would need to file a written request within
ninety days after the beginning of the taxable year and would need to
include the information mentioned above as well as additional
information:
- The name and address of the taxpayer;
- The businesses to which the election applies, and
the method of accounting used therein;
- The taxable year to which the election first
applies;
- The period to which the real property tax relate;
- The computation of the deduction for real property
taxes for the first year of election (or a summary of such
computation); and
- An adequate description of the manner in which all
real property taxes were deducted in the year prior to the year of
election.
The ratable accrual method is not a difficult method for
the taxpayer
to elect and implement. However, most taxpayers are unaware of
the requirement of electing it for the first applicable tax year of the
business, even though consent of the Internal Revenue
Service is not required. Although the recurring items exception
would often apply in the absence of its election, if there were any
question as to the active participation of a partner in the
business, it might be advisable for the taxpayer to elect the ratable
accrual method for the recognition of real property taxes anyway.
A number of small partnerships are susceptible to the
exposure of being characterized as a tax shelter by the IRS;
consequently, it might be prudent for the taxpayer to err on the
conservative side and make the ratable accrual election, since failure
to do so may result in unnecessary costs to the taxpayer.
This article is provided for informational purposes and is
not intended to be construed as legal, accounting, or other
professional advice. For further information, please consult
appropriate professional advice from your attorney and certified public
accountant.
Have a tax, a QuickBooks, or an accounting question? Please feel
free to submit
it under "Comments" on our
blog, Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by
William Brighenti,
Certified Public
Accountant, Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC. For
information
and assistance on
any tax, QuickBooks, or accounting issue, please visit our
website: Accountants CPA
Hartford, LLC. Please visit our sister website, Intense Flavors,
and see how you can have a gourmet meal on us when we do your
accounting, QuickBooks, and taxes.
If and only
to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax
professionals who are subject to the
rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated
by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on
behalf of those
contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is
contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used
by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the
taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any
taxpayer for
such purpose. The above tax advice was
written to support the promotion or marketing of the accounting
practice of the publisher and any transaction described herein. The taxpayer recipients of this offering
memorandum should seek tax advice based on their particular
circumstances from an independent
tax advisor.
|